Epox 8KRA2+ (KT600): KT600 Hits the Streets
by Evan Lieb on July 1, 2003 12:13 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Epox 8KRA2+: Stress Testing
We performed stress tests to the 8KRA2+ in several different areas and configurations, including:
1. Chipset and motherboard stress testing, conducted by running the FSB at 215MHz; and
2. Memory stress testing, conducted by running RAM at 400MHz with one DIMM slot filled and at 400MHz with all three DIMM slots occupied at the lowest timings possible.
Front Side Bus Stress Test Results:
As usual, we ran a large load of stress tests and benchmarks to ensure the 8KRA2+ was absolutely stable at each experimented, overclocked FSB speed. We ran our standard array of stress tests, including Prime95 torture tests, which were run in the background for a total of 24 hours.
We also proceeded to run a number of other tasks, such as data compression, various DX8 games, and light applications like Word and Excel, while running Prime95 in the background. Finally, we re-ran our entire benchmark suite, which includes Sysmark 2002, Quake3 Arena, Unreal Tournament 2003, SPECviewperf 7.0, Jedi Knight 2 and XMPEG. In the end, 215MHz FSB was the highest overclock speed that we were able to achieve on the 8KRA2+ using our conservative overclocking setup without encountering reliability issues.
Memory Stress Test Results:
This memory stress test is very basic, as it simply tests the ability of the 8KRA2+ to operate at its officially supported memory frequency (400MHz DDR) and at the lowest supported memory timings that our Corsair TwinX LL modules support:
Stable DDR400 Timings (1/3 banks populated) | |
Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
Timing Mode: | Ultra |
CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
Bank Interleave: | 4-bank |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 2T |
RAS Precharge: | 6T |
Precharge Delay: | 2T |
Command Rate: | 1T |
It’s not surprising to see that the 8KRA2+ achieved such low memory timings with just one memory module running at 400MHz DDR.
The following memory stress test is obviously a bit more strenuous on the memory subsystem than most memory stress tests, since it tests the rare occasion that a desktop user will install three DIMMs running at DDR400, at the most aggressive memory timings available in the BIOS:
Stable DDR400 Timings (3/3 banks populated) | |
Clock Speed: | 200MHz |
Timing Mode: | Manual |
CAS Latency: | 2.0 |
Bank Interleave: | disabled |
RAS to CAS Delay: | 3T |
RAS Precharge: | 6T |
Precharge Delay: | 2T |
Command Rate: | 1T |
These are fairly decent memory timings, considering all memory banks are occupied and running at 400MHz DDR. However, we’ve certainly seen better timings, especially from dual channel DDR motherboards. All in all, these results really aren’t that poor.
We tested all these memory timings using several stress tests and general applications to guarantee stability. We initiated the tests by running Prime95 torture tests; a grand total of 24 hours of Prime95 was successfully run at the timings listed in the above charts. We also ran Sciencemark (memory tests only) and Super Pi. All three stress tests could not make the 8KRA2+ fail at the timings listed in the above charts.
14 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Friday, July 25, 2003 - link
What about stability? Does it perform better than Nforce2 400? same as KT400A does compared to Nforce2?Anonymous User - Saturday, July 19, 2003 - link
What about ECC memory support. A mobo that offers RAID w/o ECC is useless!.bh.Anonymous User - Friday, July 18, 2003 - link
You complain about the AGP/PCI bus being out of spec. It's a whole 2.5/pci and 5 mhz AGP out of spec. I don't know of any hardware that would have a problem at those speeds. You either ran out of headroom with the chip or the board just won't go past 215-220 or so. Hopefully you'll find out with other KT600 test boards.Anonymous User - Saturday, July 12, 2003 - link
It's just strange because right after he says he still highly recommends the board, he goes on to suggest that people buy an Nforce2 board if they can afford it. I don't know why he would highly recommend a board with "mediocre" performance.Anonymous User - Saturday, July 12, 2003 - link
I don't see why this board is still "highly recommended" after all the negative comments regarding the board.Anonymous User - Thursday, July 10, 2003 - link
Guess some few points were missing in the review: Performance of integrated LAN, IDE and Audio. Remember that nForce2 has a very low CPU utilization in all these three groups. Also the comparison of Audio DSP, 3D sound, ... were missing.Anonymous User - Tuesday, July 8, 2003 - link
including the older kt400 series results would be nice...Zuni - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link
Almost every large website worldwide uses flash. Nba.com, cnet.com,zdnet.com etc almost every ad these days is in flash. Most of the larger sites use flash for navigation and other fancy effects. We're just using it for graphing :)Zuni - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link
Err smaller in size :)Zuni - Sunday, July 6, 2003 - link
The reason they are in flash is bandwidth, they are over 50% small in size. We hear your feedback though.