Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe & Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra: SiS 655TX Challenges Intel's Best
by Wesley Fink on December 9, 2003 1:52 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
A Closer Look at SiS 655TX
While AnandTech was impressed with the features and value of the earlier Gigabyte 655FX, the performance found was nothing to write home about. So what has SiS changed in the 655TX incarnation to improve performance?The most significant performance improvement in the 655TX is the reduction in latency by removing half the command cycles from the communication between the CPU and memory. SiS claims that this brings memory performance to 865/875 levels, which would be significant indeed since the Intel memory controller is a very good performer for a chipset-based controller.
Other features of the 655TX are very close to the 655FX, but they are refined to be more competitive with current and upcoming Intel chipsets. The 655TX is also paired with the 964 South Bridge to offer SATA RAID and 8 USB 2.0 ports for a very contemporary feature set.
Full Prescott Compatibility
655TX also fully supports FMB (Flexible Motherboard) 2.0 and VRM (Voltage Regulator Module) 10.0 specifications. This means full compatibility with upcoming Prescott processors. Both the Asus and Gigabyte manuals list Socket 478 Prescott processors as fully supported on their 655TX motherboards. Since there has been so much confusion and misinformation on the web about the new specifications, the FMB and VRM tables should help in better understanding what is required and the features provided in the new standards.FMB 1, 1.5, 2.0 | |||
CPU Code Support | FMB 1 | FMB 1.5 | FMB 2 |
Willamette VRM9.0 | 60A | ||
Northwood VRD10 | 60A | 70A | |
Prescott VRD10 | 78A | 91A | 119A VRD10.1 |
VRM 10.0 VS VRM 9.0 | |||
VRM 10.0 | VRM 9.0 | Benefit of VRM 10.0 | |
VID | 6 bit | 5 bit | More accurate voltage adjustment |
0.0125V | 0.025V | ||
Voltage Range | 0.8375 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.85 | Lower voltage |
Dynamic VID | Yes | No | Supports CPU that can change Voltage on the Fly |
SiS655TX Specifications
Advanced HyperStreaming™ EngineHost Interface
High Performance Dual DDR Memory Controller
Support AGP 8X Interface
MuTIOL® 1G Delivering 1GB/s Bandwidth
SiS964 MuTIOL® 1G Media I/O
MuTIOL® 1G Delivering 1GB/s BandwidthUSB 2.0/1.1 Host Controller
Serial ATA Host Controller
PCI 2.3 Specification Compliance
Fast Ethernet/Home Networking Controller with MII Interface
Audio/Modem Controllers with AC'97 Interface
Advanced Power Management
Dual IDE Channels with Parallel ATA 133/100
LPC 1.1 Interface
Integrated RTC
Integrated Keyboard/PS2 Mouse Controller
24 Comments
View All Comments
WhoBeDaPlaya - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link
LOL swt - wish I got paid for the reviews I write :Pswt - Saturday, February 7, 2004 - link
Having bought the P4S800E, I can correct a couple of misimpressions.First, the passive heatsink on the NB isn't so large as to interfere with my Zalman CNPS-7000Cu. Other mondo coolers might be problematic, of course.
And the AMI BIOS now supports multiple CPU Core settings, all the way up to 1.9V. Since I don't get paid to write such reviews, I'm not going to type in the details - but the BIOS that shipped with the MB *has* been updated in that regard, as promised.
buzzby311 - Tuesday, December 30, 2003 - link
buzzby311 - Tuesday, December 30, 2003 - link
All of the current memory reviews talk about memory that is great for the 865 875 chipsets. What memory would be good for overclocking on this motherboard with an Intel 3.0GHz 800FSB HT processor?Wesley Fink - Monday, December 15, 2003 - link
Asus says the P4S800D-E will appear on their web site on Friday, December 19, 2003. They expect the boards to be available for sale in the US by January 1.ColdRolledSteel - Thursday, December 11, 2003 - link
I also would like to know when the P4S800D-E is coming out. It isn't listed anywhere, including on the usa.asus.com website....Wesley Fink - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link
Spacecomber -We normally check FSB and report those that are out of spec. With these 3 boards all are within 0.5MHz of 200. The Asus P4S800D-E is 200.1, and both Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra and Asus P4C800-E are at 200.5. If numbers are way off we correct them to 200 (800) before running benchmarks if possible.
Spacecomber - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link
Unless I missed it, did you check to make sure no one was cheating a bit with their front side bus speed? Is a 200 MHz frontside bus really a 200 MHz frontside bus for all three boards that you compared?Thx
Space
Wesley Fink - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link
#14 - All our Benchmark tests on the 655TX boards were done with an ATI 9800 PRO with Fast Writes enabled, so there does not not seem to be a general problem with ATI cards.valnar - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link
#3Why would I want to give up that?