VIA K8T800 PRO: PCI/AGP Lock and 1000 HyperTransport for Athlon 64
by Wesley Fink on May 6, 2004 5:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Performance Test Configuration
To provide the best comparison to other Socket 940 boards we have tested, all benchmarks were run with an FX51 instead of the faster FX53 that was recently introduced. Memory timings were also kept as close as possible to those we used in the Socket 940 roundup.| Performance Test Configuration - 3.2C | |
| Processor(s): | AMD Athlon 64 FX51 (2.2GHz) AMD Athlon 3400+ (2.2GHz) |
| RAM: | 2 x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Registered ECC 2 x 512MB Mushkin PC3200 ECC Registered |
| Hard Drive(s): | Seagate 120GB 7200 RPM (8MB Buffer) |
| Video AGP & IDE Bus Master Drivers: | VIA Hyperion 4.51 (12-02-2003) |
| Video Card(s): | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB (AGP 8X) |
| Video Drivers: | ATI Catalyst 4.4 |
| Operating System(s): | Windows XP Professional SP1 |
| Motherboards: | VIA K8T800 PRO Reference Board Asus SK8N (nVidia nForce3-150 PRO) Gigabyte K8NNXP-940 (nVidia nF3-150 PRO) Asus SK8V (VIA K8T800) MSI K8T Master 2 (VIA K8T800) MSI K8N Neo (nVidia nForce3-250Gb) nVidia nForce3-250 Reference Board |
In most benchmarks, comparisons were only made among Socket 940 motherboards running an Athlon 64 FX51. However, some results for newer benchmarks were not available on the FX51. In that case, we published benchmarks on the 3400+, which also runs at 2.2GHz. We have found only minor differences in Athlon 64 and FX chips when they are running at the same frequency.
All performance tests were run with the ATI 9800 PRO 128MB video card with AGP Aperture set to 128MB with Fast Write enabled. Resolution in all benchmarks is 1024x768x32 unless otherwise noted.
Overclocking and Stress Testing: VIA K8T800 PRO Reference Board
Content Creation, General Usage, and Media Encoding
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
15 Comments
View All Comments
Odeen - Saturday, May 8, 2004 - link
#4: The answer is pretty much a "yes"Reason: Firewire, in this design, sits on the PCI bus. Gigabit networking sits on the PCI bus. Any soundcard / chip better than chipset-provided onboard sound sits on the PCI bus. Any additional hard drive controllers sit on the PCI bus.
On non-server motherboards, the PCI bus runs at 33mhz and is 32 bits wide, for 133 megabytes/sec of bandwidth
Firewire is 400mbit/sec per port. The new design is 800mbit/sec. This means you will use a maximum of 50 megabytes/sec for a firewire/400 port (granted, the practical peak is less than 50mb/sec, but you'll never eke out 133mb/sec out of the PCI bus either). Add to that the 250mb/sec full-duplex Gigabit Ethernet can generate, and 150mb/sec for ever SATA port courtesy of those Silicon Image chips, and you can see that you're starved for bandwidth.
On the other hand, there's a tidy 533 megabytes/sec of bandwidth between the northbridge and the southbridge.. that means everything that runs straight off the southbridge can report back to the northbridge and, consequently, to the CPU at 533mb/sec. Subtract 133mb/sec for the PCI, and you still have 400 megabytes for LAN and hard drives and firewire, if it's implemented in the southbridge.
Unfortunately, the only true "onboard" firewire comes courtesy of the MCP-T southbridge on nForce2 boards. Everyone else (All Via, all SiS, all Intel chipsets, and all chipsets for Athlon64) has to use a PCI firewire chip.
Pumpkinierre - Friday, May 7, 2004 - link
Welsey #11, I would liked to have seen an 8or9 x 233and234. I still smell a rat. I've run some mobos at 41MHz PCI speed in the past while others (same brand and chipset but different review) would not function. The fact that other posts claim that ABIT have left out the AGP/PCI lock feature of this chipset adds to my suspicion.Klaasman - Friday, May 7, 2004 - link
Why oh why ABIT, would they leave this out?? Damn it!blup - Friday, May 7, 2004 - link
This board breaks my heart. I was hoping for a "BH7 for Athlon 64" i.e. cheap, fast, very overclockable. It is not to be.ABIT has NOT implemented the PCI/AGP lock on this board - maybe there will be a more expensive MAX model that does. Checkout one man's review at http://www.nickgoodall.org/kv8pro/review1.htm
Wesley Fink - Friday, May 7, 2004 - link
#10 -I did a quick check with PC Geiger and the bus was locked on the Reference Board. Since I had the board for only 2 days for testing, there was no time for much more. You will also see I reached 231 overclock on the FX51 at 10 ratio, in addition to the 255x8.
Checking my review notes, I also tested the 10 multiplier at 233 and 234 to determine if there was a ratio drop. I could boot at 233 but the system wasn't completely stable; the CPU simply would not do 234 at standard multiplier. This also suggests a working lock.
Please also keep in mind that VIA has a working pci/agp lock on the PT880 chipset for the P4, so this is not their first PCI/AGP lock. It is just their first lock on an Athlon 64 chipset.
Pumpkinierre - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - link
You got to 8x252 on the Aopen AK86-L (VIA chipset/Skt754) which didnt have PCI/AGP lock but ratio controlled. Given its an a64/FX chipset (and on top VIA) where AGP/PCI lock has been a matter of controversy, would'nt it have been prudent to have used your PCIgeiger to check the PCI frequencies at the different FSB settings-so that we wont be fooled once again!Jeff7181 - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - link
This is definately a good thing... finally overclockers have a choice between chipsets.Warder45 - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - link
I thought the Pro was going to have a HT speed of 1200?Wesley Fink - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - link
#6 -PCI/AGP lock is DEFINITELY working on the Reference Board, but I can not yet address whether Abit has implemented the lock or just dropped the PRO chipset in the older design with no changes. I did see the one review in the UK reporting this issue before the VIA review was finished.
We do have the Abit board coming to us for testing and I will report what I find.
Klaasman - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - link
Abit has a board out now but reports are that it does NOT have the AGP/PCI lock working.