Canon Digital Rebel XT: Hardly an Entry-Level DSLR
by Stephen Caston on May 3, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Digital Camera
Final Words
There is no doubt about it. The Canon EOS 350D is incredibly impressive for an entry-level digital SLR. In virtually all of our tests, it performed on par with its older and more expensive prosumer brother - the Canon EOS 20D. One of the biggest performance upgrades from the original digital rebel is the DIGIC II image processor. The DIGIC II processor provides the 350D with blazing fast processing speed and very low-noise images. In our timing tests, the 350D proved to be just as fast as the 20D, which is leaps and bounds faster than the original DRebel (300D). It has a remarkable startup time of 0.31 sec and, of course, shutter lag is of no concern. Where the 350D truly shines is with regard to cycle/write times. You are almost never left waiting for the camera to process/write images. The 350D has a much larger buffer than the 300D and thanks to the DIGIC II processor, the images are processed and dumped to the CF card at a very high speed.With regard to image quality, the 350D does not disappoint. With the neutral processing parameter (2) selected, we found images to have excellent detail and overall exposure. The 350D also provides several preset and adjustable parameters allowing users to tweak the in-camera processing levels. Of course, as with all SLR cameras, it is expected that users will spend some time fine-tuning sharpness, contrast, etc. in post-processing. In comparing resolution capabilities, we found the 350D to have an identical resolution performance to the 20D. In addition, both the 350D and 20D show the same low level of noise in our noise analysis. The advantage of the 20D is that it has an option for ISO 3200 where the 350D only goes to ISO 1600.
As you can see, we couldn't find a lot to complain about with the 350D. We did think that the LCD monitor was a bit darker than it was on the 300D. This meant that we had to shield the monitor from the sun when reviewing images outdoors. Also, we are still rather disappointed with the Auto WB system under tungsten light as it produces a fairly strong yellowish cast. Finally, the size of the handgrip was a bit too small for us, which caused an uncomfortable strain in our hand after long periods of shooting. Anyone with larger hands will want to try holding the camera before purchasing it to make sure it feels right. Otherwise, we recommend getting the BG-E3 battery grip to provide more gripping support for ~$150. Along with the smaller body came a smaller battery as well. However, we are happy to see that the battery had no trouble lasting through several thousand frames in our battery test. All in all, the Canon 350D is an amazing deal at ~$890 for the body itself or ~$940 with the kit lens. If this camera looks appealing to you, take our word of caution about the grip seriously. Try to get your hands on one so that you can really get an idea of how it feels. It is exciting to see that the digital SLR market is rapidly expanding with faster and higher-quality cameras, and we are looking forward to what will come next.
Pros | Cons |
|
|
Thanks again to Newegg.com for loaning us the Canon Rebel XT for review.
27 Comments
View All Comments
6000SUX - Sunday, May 8, 2005 - link
Thanks for a great review. Based on this one, I went to some other sites like dpreview.com, checked out lots of sample pictures etc. against competitors like the D70 and decided to take the plunge. All I can say is, this camera's fantastic. It's easy even for a relative newbie like me to get up to speed and take really great pictures.Now I have a great camera with which to take pictures of my first child. Thanks again.
stephencaston - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
#23, Unfortunately, since the digicam section is still relatively new, we don't have a lot of places to get products right now (lenses). We have been able to do Canon SLR reviews simply because we already have lenses. Don't worry, we are planning on covering the new Nikon DSLRs as soon as we can get them.Stephen
sgtroyer - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
I've got to add to the calls for a Nikon DSLR review. It's a pretty glaring omission given the reviews of the Canon 300D, 20D, and 350D, but no Nikon. The D70 is a fantastic camera, far better than the 300D for marginally more money. The D50 will provide even better value. Isn't reviewing only Canon DSLRs sort of like reviewing only Nvidia GPU's or Intel processors?stephencaston - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
Keep in mind that this isn't a "real world" battery test. We literally sat down with the camera and took 3,818 frames in one session.Ender78 - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - link
The battery life stated here seems to be a little off. I will have to test, but I dont believe my camera has anywhere close to the stated battery life.gplracer - Wednesday, May 4, 2005 - link
Nice review. I decided on the 20D over the 350 because of the size, feel, and the controls. The wheel in the back of the 20D is so much better than the controls on the 350. I am sure picture quality is close.brownba - Wednesday, May 4, 2005 - link
even my sd300 has this 'rattle.'i too assume it's for determining position.
that's the coolest thing - when you're in clock mode, if you swiftly move the camera, it will change the color of the clock.
shuttleboi - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link
From what I've read, the viewfinder on the XT is even smaller than the tiny one I have on my 300D. I also own a Canon film SLR, and the viewfinder in that is freaking huge compared to the one in my 300D. When you have a wide-aperture lens (larger than f2.8), then you will want a large viewfinder to see if you are focusing correctly, otherwise it is very easy to get the focus plane locked with the narrow depth of field.shuttleboi - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link
#13: if the XT is like my 300D, then that rattling sound is the part of the camera that determines if you are holding the camera vertically or horizontally. It is normal.STaSh - Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - link
No idea...I have a 20d.