Sub $100 Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 3600 and 3400 Series
by Derek Wilson on January 23, 2008 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Final Words
We wish we could have had hardware available for this launch. We always have to work a little harder to get our hands on lower end and value products, as companies would rather people all see how good their fastest parts run. But we will do our best to get some numbers sooner rather than later.
This launch isn't revolutionary, as it's really just AMD bringing their 3000 series down to the lower end. Hybrid Graphics could be an interesting feature, but we'll have to test it before we can find out if it's more marketing than magic.
Our desire to see ever increasing performance in high volume graphics markets generally exceeds what we are offered, and even though there is competition between NVIDIA and AMD, neither company wants to create too large a gap between their low end add-in cards and integrated graphics. But no matter what we get, at least we will see some sort of performance improvement over what is currently on the market.
Stay tuned, as the next few weeks promise some interesting developments. We'll be getting together some data on these low end AMD parts as well as some coverage of higher end hardware.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
22 Comments
View All Comments
LostPassword - Monday, February 4, 2008 - link
when are you guys going to actually review it?Mazen - Monday, March 17, 2008 - link
Would be nice to finally see that reviewMazen - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link
Thanks for that article. I would love to see you guys pushing these cards at 2560x1600 resolution when decoding a H.264 or VC-1 to see if they are powerful enough to manage 1600p. I think that AMD put out in their press release that the 3450 will have hiccups at 1440p but that the 3470 will be able to manage that resolution just fine. Can we please please (pretty please) see if these card will handle decoding at that resolution?dvijaydev46 - Thursday, January 24, 2008 - link
Why isn't there a review on those newest ATI products yet? legitreviews has responded to it long ago.eye smite - Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - link
First of all, yesterday on dailytech the sister site to this one, in the daily reviews section are websites already reviewing the HD3870X2 card and it showing in most benchmarks a noticeable lead of the top nvidia card.Second, if ATI gives anandtech a card to test last, who can blame them. I mean after all they published a review on the phenom that was more a rant than a review on the cpu. I say up the ra to the editors and writers at anand. I come here for a good laugh from time to time, but reading your articles for the last few months has me rating you in the same class as gizmodo and what they did at CES 2008. Hope you all go back to journalistic basics and become a reputable site like Tom's Hardware again one day.
AssBall - Thursday, January 24, 2008 - link
I say up the ra to the editors and writers at anand. I come here for a good laugh from time to time, but reading your articles for the last few months has me rating you in the same class as gizmodo and what they did at CES 2008. Hope you all go back to journalistic basics and become a reputable site like Tom's Hardware again one day.---------------------------------------------------------------------
I LoL'ed. Toms Hardware rofl... That was a good one!
StormEffect - Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - link
I'm also curious how these cards will compete with the current Nvidia low and mid range cards. Until the G92 refresh hits those segments, it looks like ATI will be leading those markets.Also, the 3870 X2 utilizes internal crossfire. Games do not need crossfire compatibility to run on the 3870 X2. The card appears as a single GPU to the OS. There are already reviews for the 3870 X2, and it looks as though ATI has taken the crown in a few benchmarks.
djc208 - Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - link
I'm looking forward to how these actually handle HD playback. I stayed away from the 2400 in my HTPC because the benchmarks said it wasn't quit powerful enough for HD playback.If the $50 3450 can handle H.264 playback at HDTV resolutions with no issues I can skip the $250 SageTV HD extender and use that money for the new Hauppage HD capture card and one of these instead.
Slash3 - Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - link
I4U has a review of the Radeon HD 3450 HTPC (passive cooling, low profile) up here:http://www.i4u.com/section-viewarticle-368.html">http://www.i4u.com/section-viewarticle-368.html
It looks like it offloads a significant amount of the video decoding to the GPU, and could be the perfect HTPC card for a lot of people.
themadmilkman - Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - link
Do these cards REALLY need active cooling? Judging by the size of the heatsink and fan, and the size of heatsinks on other cards that have been replaced with passive cooling, it doesn't seem like these cards would actually need to be actively cooled.I may be wrong, of course, since conjectures based off of one chart and a few pictures are often wrong. But if the 3650 performs well (I'm currently running a 7600GS, it should definitely be an upgrade) and a silent version is produced, I may have a new card.