SYSMark 2000 approaches benchmarking in a slightly different way than CC Winstone 2K in that it only runs a single application at a time. This results in a slight shift of the performance dependency from memory performance to the rest of the system as a whole (although memory performance is definitely still a factor).

This allows the 825MHz overclock to be pushed to the top of the list with a very impressive SYSMark 2000 score of 163. However on a clock for clock basis the 694X platform is still outperformed by the BX. This would be a definite downside to going with the 694X (Apollo Pro 133A) if it weren't for the fact that the BX chipset, with it's lack of a 1/2 AGP clock divider, isn't as good of a solution for overclocking using 133MHz+ FSB settings.

Realistically speaking, on a BX board with an AGP card not capable of running at 89MHz (133MHz FSB * 2/3 AGP divider = 89MHz) would most likely limit FC-PGA overclockers to speed below 700MHz. When you can hit 733 - 825MHz relatively easily on an official 133MHz FSB platform, the Apollo Pro 133A is definitely worth it, in spite of the fact that it is slower than the BX.

Content Creation Performance Quake III Arena Performance
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now