AMD's Athlon XP 1900+ (1.6GHz): Still #1
by Anand Lal Shimpi on November 5, 2001 12:40 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Media Encoding Performance
We benchmarked three different types of media encoding: MPEG-4 video, MPEG-2 video and MP3 audio encoding. First we start out with MPEG-4 encoding under Flask.
We benchmarked Flask using the following settings:
1) The input video was a 320 x 240, non-interlaced, MPEG-1 file
2) The iDCT algorithm was set to autodetect thus selecting the fastest possible
algorithm for the particular processor
3) We used the Flask MPEG v0.60 preview with the official DivX 4.01 codec
available at www.divx.com
4) The output resolution was set at 352 x 288, filtering quality set to the
highest possible, and audio was not decoded
5) The DivX 4.01 codec was selected in the configure output settings; since
audio wasn't being decoded we did not change any audio options
6) The encoding process was started and the frame rate at the end of the process
was recorded and reported below.
|
The performance domination continues as the Athlon XP scales with its clock speed. The 4% increase in clock speed resulted in a 3% increase in performance, neither of which is tangible to the end user but looks good on paper, right?
The lead over the Pentium 4 2GHz is only extended with the Athlon XP 1900+; what once was almost a 10% advantage has been extended to just over 13%. When you look at it from that perspective, the 1900+ is icing on the cake.
|
The picture doesn't change much as we switch to MPEG-2 as our chosen encoding algorithm. This time using MadOnion's Video 2000 as a benchmark we see that the 1900+ is able to hold a 9% advantage over Intel's flagship.
|
For our MP3 encoding test we used version 3.89 of the Win32 LAME encoder binaries. We took a 170MB wav file and encoded it using the following command-line options: -v -V 0. This created a variable bit rate MP3, varying the bit rates between 160 kbps and 320 kbps. The end result was a 27MB MP3 file that took between 2 and 4 minutes to encode.
This was the first test we looked at last month where the Athlon XP wasn't able to clearly dominate the Pentium 4. The 2GHz offering from Intel even outperformed AMD's flagship at the time, but the introduction of the 1900+ does change that. Because the top of the charts are all within a few percent of one another, the performance stats only really start to change once you pass the 3 minute marker.
0 Comments
View All Comments