AMD's 0.13-micron Thoroughbred - Cool but Slipping at 2200+
by Anand Lal Shimpi on June 10, 2002 2:55 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
What makes Thoroughbred's clock tick
The architectural specifications of Thoroughbred are identical to its 0.18-micron predecessor which we've written about extensively here and here. Here are some of the details of the Thoroughbred core that do set it apart from Palomino:
Thoroughbred
vs. Palomino vs. Intel's Northwood
|
|||
Code Name |
Palomino
|
Thoroughbred
|
Northwood
|
Manufacturing Process |
0.18-micron
|
0.13-micron
|
0.13-micron
|
Die Size |
128
mm^2
|
80
mm^2
|
146
mm^2
(eventually 131 mm^2) |
Transistor Count |
37.5
Million
|
37.2
Million
|
55
Million
|
Voltage |
1.750V
|
1.50V
- 1.65V
|
1.50V
|
Clock Speeds |
1.2
- 1.73GHz
|
1.47
- 1.8GHz+
|
1.6
- 2.53GHz+
|
You'll notice that there is a small decrease in transistor count when going to the Thoroughbred core. AMD was able to accomplish this by optimizing the core during the die shrink similar to what happened with the Palomino. You'll also notice that the Thoroughbred core requires much higher voltages to hit much lower clock speeds than Intel's Northwood, keep that in mind especially when we talk about the overclocking potential of the new core later on in the review.
Thermal Comparison
Processor
Model |
Operating
Frequency (MHz) |
Nominal
Voltage |
Typical
Thermal Power |
Maximum
Thermal Power |
Typical
Current Working State |
Max
Current Working State |
AXDA 1700+ |
1467
|
1.50V
|
44.9W
|
49.4W
|
29.9A
|
32.9A
|
AXDA 1800+ |
1533
|
46.3W
|
51.0W
|
30.9A
|
34.0A
|
|
AXDA 1900+ |
1600
|
47.7W
|
52.5W
|
31.8A
|
35.0A
|
|
AXDA 2000+ |
1667
|
1.60V
|
54.7W
|
60.3W
|
34.2A
|
37.7A
|
AXDA 2100+ |
1733
|
56.4W
|
62.1W
|
35.2A
|
38.8A
|
|
AXDA 2200+ |
1800
|
1.65V
|
61.7W
|
67.9W
|
37.4A
|
41.2A
|
1500+ |
1333
|
1.75V
|
53.8W
|
60W
|
30.8A
|
34.3A
|
1600+ |
1400
|
56.3W
|
62.8W
|
32.2A
|
35.9A
|
|
1700+ |
1467
|
57.4W
|
64W
|
32.8A
|
36.6A
|
|
1800+ |
1533
|
59.2W
|
66W
|
33.8A
|
37.7A
|
|
1900+ |
1600
|
60.7W
|
68W
|
34.7A
|
38.9A
|
|
2000+ |
1667
|
62.5W
|
70W
|
35.7A
|
40A
|
|
2100+ |
1733
|
64.3W
|
72W
|
36.7A
|
41.1A
|
|
Pentium
4
|
||||||
2.0A |
2000
|
1.50V
|
52.4W
|
44.3A
|
||
2.2 |
2200
|
55.1W
|
47.1A
|
|||
2.26 |
2266
|
56W
|
48A
|
|||
2.40B |
2400
|
57.8W
|
49.8A
|
|||
2.53 |
2533
|
59.3W
|
51.5A
|
Note: AXDA denotes Thoroughbred core
The main thing to take away from this chart is that the Thoroughbred puts out around 12% less heat than an equivalently clocked Palomino core. Despite the reduction in heat dissipation the core still puts out more heat than Intel's Northwood core which is understandable because of the Athlon XP's higher IPC. You'll also notice that the Northwood draws more peak current (Intel didn't provide Max thermal power or typical current data) than the Athlon XP; it does so at a lower voltage and thus gets away with less heat.
0 Comments
View All Comments