Performance - Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
Jedi
Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
High Quality: 640x480x32 |
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 460
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4
440 Go Max Performance
Desktop
GeForce2 MX
GeForce4
440 Go Balanced
GeForce4
440 Go Battery
|
|
|
80.6
78.4
74
60.6
59.3
29.9
|
|
|
0 |
|
16 |
|
32 |
|
48 |
|
64 |
|
81 |
|
97 |
|
|
|
A new game to our mobile review performance analysis section, we did not have
Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast scores for the Mobility Radeon 7500 system. We can
hypothesize, however, that the GeForce4 440 Go would continue to outperform
the Mobility Radeon 7500 as it has in the majority of other tests.
The performance of the mobile chip was only 5.9% off the performance of the
desktop GeForce4 MX 440. With PowerMizer set to a setting other than maximum
performance, frame rate was limited in an effort to save power.
Jedi
Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
High Quality: 800x600x32 |
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 460
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4
440 Go Max Performance
GeForce4
440 Go Balanced
Desktop
GeForce2 MX
GeForce4
440 Go Battery
|
|
|
80.1
78.1
73.8
59.3
49.6
30
|
|
|
0 |
|
16 |
|
32 |
|
48 |
|
64 |
|
80 |
|
96 |
|
|
|
Frame rates really do not fall off when going from 640x480x32 to 800x600x32.
As we have noted before, Jedi Knight 2 is a very CPU intensive game, so increasing
the resolution slightly does not necessarily decrease performance. The standings
of the cards remain similar, with only the desktop GeForce2 MX falling in performance
significantly.
Jedi
Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
High Quality: 1024x768x32 |
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 460
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4
440 Go Max Performance
GeForce4
440 Go Balanced
Desktop
GeForce2 MX
GeForce4
440 Go Battery
|
|
|
79.9
75.9
71
55.6
37.3
29.9
|
|
|
0 |
|
16 |
|
32 |
|
48 |
|
64 |
|
80 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
Again, performance does not really fall off at this resolution. We can see
that at over 70FPS, the GeForce4 440 Go is more than able to play Jedi Knight
2. Even with PowerMizer set to balanced or battery mode, performance should
still be acceptable (although on the border in maximum battery life mode).
Jedi
Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
High Quality: 1280x1024x32 |
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 460
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4
440 Go Max Performance
GeForce4
440 Go Balanced
Desktop
GeForce2 MX
GeForce4
440 Go Battery
|
|
|
75.5
49.9
45.8
30.6
24
19.4
|
|
|
0 |
|
15 |
|
30 |
|
45 |
|
60 |
|
76 |
|
91 |
|
|
|
Finally we see the systems tested hit a video card bottleneck and not a CPU
one. Performance of everything with the exception of the desktop GeForce4 MX
460 falls off at 1280x1024x32. The GeForce4 440 Go comes in at 9.0% slower than
the GeForce4 MX 440 and 64.8% slower than the GeForce4 MX 460. Balanced mode
performance is 49.7% slower than maximum performance mode and maximum battery
life mode is 57.7% slower than balanced mode.
Jedi
Knight 2: Jedi Outcast
High Quality: 1600x1200x32 |
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 460
Desktop
GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4
440 Go Max Performance
GeForce4
440 Go Balanced
GeForce4
440 Go Battery
Desktop
GeForce2 MX
|
|
|
59.4
32.8
30.1
23.6
15
14.7
|
|
|
0 |
|
12 |
|
24 |
|
36 |
|
48 |
|
59 |
|
71 |
|
|
|
At 1600x1200x32 the GeForce4 440 Go performs only 9.0% slower than the desktop
GeForce4 MX 440: not bad considering the extremely high resolution we were benchmarking
at. Playablity is iffy under balanced mode and not really possible in battery
mode. Then again, both of these modes are faster than the not so old GeForce2
MX that many still have in their system. Not bad for a mobile chip, not bad
at all.
0 Comments
View All Comments