The Test

We thought that it would make the most sense to compare the Radeon IGP chipset in the Presario 900 to the other mobile AMD capable chipsets out there. It is for this reason that we compared the Radeon IGP to the SiS 740 chipset found in the ECS i-Buddie XP. Bear in mind that both chipsets use integrated graphics solutions and thus are not too keen on running complex 3D games. We decided to test both chipsets under games just to give an idea of how performance of these solutions stand.

The SiS 740 chipset did find its way into a handful of mobile AMD systems including some OEM manufactured systems by ASUS and Alphatop. Although the ECS i-Buddie XP that we used as the SiS 740 platform is not a full notebook computer, we swapped out the system CPU with the 1500+ CPU found in the Presario 900 in order to even out the playing field.

Besides the Radeon IGP 320M and the SiS 740, the only other mobile AMD chipset out there is the aged KN133 chipset. The majority of mobile AMD notebooks out there today are actually using this chipset despite its very limited feature set (due to OEM's hesitation to go with a SiS/ALi mobile chipset solution). Unfortunately we did not have a KN133 notebook available at the time of review but you can be sure that both the Radeon IGP 320M and the SiS 740 will perform much faster than the KN133.

We left out the other notebooks we have reviewed for a number of reasons. First off, all but one notebooks we have reviewed uses discrete video solutions which will obviously not only perform faster than the integrated video solutions but are also targeted at a very deferent market. Secondly, with the exception of the i-Buddie XP, we have yet to get our hands on a Mobile Athlon XP based notebook. If you are interested in seeing what the performance difference between Athlon XP processors and Pentium 4 processors are, it would be better to take a look at our latest CPU review or compare the numbers in this review to the numbers gathered in our WinBook J4 2.4GHz review.

Also, being an integrated video chipset review, we decided to tone down the stressfulness of our benchmarks. Serious Sam The Second Encounter was tested with default settings, the numbers in Unreal Tournament 2003 are at medium detail settings, and our Jedi Knight 2 numbers were run with video set to "normal."

Windows XP Professional Test System

 

Hardware
 
Compaq Presario 900
CPU(s)
Mobile Athlon XP 1500+
Mobile Athlon XP 1500+
Motherboard(s)
Compaq Radeon IGP 320M
ECS SiS 740 DDR
Memory
256MB PC2100
256MB PC2100
Hard Drive
20.0GB Toshiba MK2018GAP
20.0GB IBM Deskstar 40GN
CDROM
Teac DVD/CDRW
Matsushita DVD-ROM
Video Card(s)
Integrated Radeon IGP 320M
Integrated SiS 740
Ethernet
RealTeK Onboard Ethernet Adapter
RealTeK Onboard Ethernet Adapter

 

Software

Operating System

Windows XP Professional

Video Drivers
ATI 7.69.3.1
SiS 2.05a

 

Benchmarking Applications
 

Bapco SysMark 2001
ZDM Content Creation Winstone 2002
BAPCo Mobile Mark 2002

Croteam Serious Sam 2: The Second Encounter
Epic Unreal Tournament 2003
Lucas Arts Entertainment Jedi Knight 2


Both systems were set to use 64MB of memory for a video buffer.
Features - Software Performance - Overall Performance
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now