SATA II to the Power of 3.0Gb/sec: Three Drives Reviewed
by Purav Sanghani on June 25, 2005 7:06 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Real World Tests - Multitasking Performance
To provide a real world example of multitasking we use run Outlook and import 450MB of emails into an account. We then time how long it takes our benchmarking utlity to zip a single 300MB file. To compare our results we calculate the difference between the multitasked process and the single task file zip process.
Outlook + File Zip 1 300MB File |
||||
NCQ/TCQ Status |
Multitasked |
File Zip Only |
% Difference |
|
Hitachi T7K250 | w/out NCQ |
76.543 |
67.057 |
12.39% |
w/NCQ |
79.815 |
65.641 |
21.6% |
|
Samsung HD160JJ | w/out NCQ |
71.484 |
58.805 |
21.6% |
w/NCQ |
73.554 |
61.068 |
20.4% |
|
Western Digital WD1600JS | N/A |
74.371 |
61.182 |
21.6% |
Very disappointing. Hitachi's T7K250 performed better than the rest in this real world multitasking test...with NCQ turned off! Now, drive manufacturers list NCQ as a native feature, but it does not seem to work too well in real world situations. As we look at products in the future, we hope to see atleast some improvement given by Native Command Queuing.
52 Comments
View All Comments
ChiefNutz - Saturday, June 25, 2005 - link
is it just me or is this review coming in without graphs, and a final conclusion?KeithP - Saturday, June 25, 2005 - link
haha