Infrant Technologies’ ReadyNAS NV: Enterprise Features, Desktop Footprint
by Purav Sanghani on March 17, 2006 11:42 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
SiSoft Sandra
SiSoft Sandra contains various benchmarks including file system and network bandwidth tests.
SiSoft Sandra contains various benchmarks including file system and network bandwidth tests.
SiSoft Sandra Results | ||||
ReadyNAS NV | ReadyNAS X6 | Seagate 250GB 7200.9 RAID 5 | ||
File System Benchmarks | ||||
Drive Index (MB/sec) | 29.1 | 24 | 60 | |
Buffered Read (MB/sec) | 47 | 46 | 226 | |
Sequential Read (MB/sec) | 33 | 29 | 66 | |
Random Read (MB/sec) | 23 | 21 | 55 | |
Buffered Write (MB/sec) | 32 | 25 | 106 | |
Sequential Write (MB/sec) | 21 | 17 | 64 | |
Random Write (MB/sec) | 21 | 17 | 42 | |
Average Access Time (ms) | 13 | 9 | 3 | |
Network Benchmark | ||||
LAN Bandwidth (MB/sec) | 24.3 | 22.48 | NA |
13 Comments
View All Comments
Iozone - Thursday, May 11, 2006 - link
There is a bad link in the article:http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/storage/infant...">http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/storage/infant...
File does not exist ...
Any chance of getting the link fixed ?
dunnp - Saturday, March 18, 2006 - link
So since the RAID performance was so good, what was the setup for the RAID?byvis - Saturday, March 18, 2006 - link
...s939 has DDR2? :-)RAM: 1GB Corsair XMS4400 DDR2 (2x512MB)
WileCoyote - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
What brand/model Raid 5 controller was used with the Seagate drives?randomlinh - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
could you imagine backing up that much data... oi...Genx87 - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
Did you put any memory into this thing or just use the basic 64MB for the OS?Curious if you didnt, if the performance throughput would increase from a larger memory?
PuravSanghani - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
The ReadyNAS units come with a 256MB SO-DIMM module. However, transfer performance would be limited by the the NIC anyway.Purav
WileCoyote - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
was journaling turned off? I've heard that has a big impact on performanceGenx87 - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
Any chance they are planning on releasing an 8 part config?Read\write wasnt terribly impressive at 24MB\sec. That is hardly pushing the disks.
But for what i need it for that is plenty. But the 4 disk limitation kind of turns me off.
WileCoyote - Friday, March 17, 2006 - link
Doesn't look like they have plans for 8 drives - they seem more interested in downsizing and compacting. There is a lot of info in their forums. At first I was turned off by the 4 drive config but then I realized it would work since I could hotswap.