Benchmarking

When benchmarking the MT-200, we test the temperatures of key components including the actual CPU temperature, the actual temperature inside the heatsink, the temperatures of the DDR, Northbridge, Southbridge, HDD, PSU, and the ambient temperature inside the case, all during normal operation. During our testing, the PSU and CPU heatsink fans remain on to measure temperatures during normal system operations.

Gigabyte GA-7VRX
AMD Athlon MP 2100+
2 x 128 DDR Corsair XMS 2400
ThermalTake Volcano 7
Seagate Cheetah 10000RPM
Inno3D GeForce4 Ti 4200
TTGI 4 Fan 520W


Thermometer Positions


The thermal readings for the key components and points on the motherboard during operation were as follows:

Opus Technologies, Inc. MT-200
 System On-Time  CPU  Heatsink  HDD  DDR  Northbridge  Southbridge  Power Supply  System Ambient
10 52.5 37.5 28.8 34.3 39.1 39.3 29.3 29.7
30 53.7 39.0 29.5 36.8 40.2 39.9 31.2 30.4

NZXT Guardian
 System On-Time  CPU  Heatsink  HDD  DDR  Northbridge  Southbridge  Power Supply  System Ambient
10 53.4 36.7 30.5 37.1 40.2 39.9 29.8 31.9
30 55.3 37.5 33.2 38.5 41.8 41.2 31.9 35.1

Ahanix Black Knight X195
 System On-Time  CPU  Heatsink  HDD  DDR  Northbridge  Southbridge  Power Supply  System Ambient
10 51.9 35.3 25.3 35.1 38.4 39.1 29.2 28.2
30 52.5 36.2 26.1 38.4 40.0 39.9 30.8 29.6

Since the MT-200 did not come with any case fans, we decided it would be best to install third party fans to simulate a typical system. We installed four 80mm fans, just as many as the Thermaltake VM3000 Skull series had. Though an optional 120mm fan can be mounted at the front of the chassis as an intake, we thought it would be best to test the case in the same state that the VM3000 was tested, since they are basically the same chassis.

In our heat tests, we predicted the results for the MT-200 to be close to, if not the same as, the VM3000. There was only a slight variability in the temperature readings, since there is always room for error. The MT-200 did, however, perform better than the NZXT Guardian, most likely due to the number of fans. A fifth, 120mm fan can also be mounted at the front to increase air flow, thus reducing temperatures further.

Since the Thermaltake Xaser VM3000 Skull produced about 55dBA of noise, we predicted the MT-200 to have the same noise levels. We measured the noise level of the MT-200 12" away from the closed chassis with the power supply fan turned off. Take a look at our results.

 Case  dBA
Opus Technologies MT-200 56
NZXT Guardian 49
Ahanix Black Knight X195 50
Lian Li PC-6070 44
Thermaltake Xaser III VM3000A - Skull 55

We read the noise levels of the MT-200 at about 1dBA higher than the VM3000. Lian Li's PC-6070 had sound-dampening foam, which lined the inside of its front bezel, and side and top panels to reduce noise levels about 10dBA. We hope all other case manufactures consider this in future designs, since it is a very effective method in reducing noise.

Installation Final Thought
Comments Locked

10 Comments

View All Comments

  • appu - Tuesday, April 27, 2004 - link

    "Since the MT-200 did not come with any case fans, we decided it would be best to install third party fans to simulate a typical system. We installed four 80mm fans, just as many as the Thermaltake VM3000 Skull series had. Though an optional 120mm fan can be mounted at the front of the chassis as an intake, we thought it would be best to test the case in the same state that the VM3000 was tested, since they are basically the same chassis."

    While the reasoning above was fine as far as
    bechmarking is concerned (where variables have to
    be kept to a minimum), it would've been great to
    look at temp. and noise figures with that 120 mm
    fan also plonked in. After all, one also has to
    test the strengths of individual systems and not
    just their performance across a level playing
    field. It's a bit like testing a CPU's overclocked
    performance after getting stock speed readings.

    My two cents.
  • KristopherKubicki - Saturday, April 24, 2004 - link

    Yeah its just some titanium alloy over the skin of the unit. i think it looks nice, but you have to see it up closee i suppose.

    Kristopher
  • Zepper - Saturday, April 24, 2004 - link

    I doubt there is any real titanium in that case - just a relatively close color match. The basic chassis is sold under many names including: Athenatech, A-GPB, Enermax (the few of their Ti finish units I can find are going for ~$100 each), Key Power, Bow Technology and now Opus. Even Fry's/Outpost sells a custom version - one of the best looking of the bunch, IMO. And you really can't beat the internal design.
    . I particularly like the version with 4 5" bays at the top and another 3 5" bays in the bottom. You can install two 5-drive, hot-swap cages in there with room left for 1 optical and 2 more stand-alone HDs. Not to mention plenty of room for the largest ATX mobos. Helluva cheap server box!
    .bh.
  • AtaStrumf - Saturday, April 24, 2004 - link

    Looks like someone beat this thing with the ugly stick.
  • roostercrows - Saturday, April 24, 2004 - link

    "titanium is softer than steel"."it also can't be polished"
    what unknown alloy of steel compared to what micron thin titanium coating on what unknown alloy of steel? all steels are alloys. using what test? Knoop Microhardness, Vickers Microhardness, Rockwell C Hardness, Rockwell 15N, 30N or 45N Superficial Hardness? it's important to know what you are comparing before you opine and even then it's tricky. mild steel is 20-25 HRc, tool steel is 44-57, chrome is 65-68, carbide is 72-81 and titanium nitride is 84-88, diamond is about 98. in theory and just for fun let's compare the edge of a "kill bill" samouri sword at about 58-60 Rockwell "C" (some chinese sword have 62-64) to a TIN (titanium nitride)sword. Uma would be dead and we don't want that. no "kill bill" three?
    also, it's easy to put a very high polish on even annealed pure titanium with a Rockwell "C" of 11. i would love to find a case made completely of titanium alloy and aluminum alloy, just to have one as i use water cooling and i don't need the case to radiate much heat. plating or polishing makes less heat get radiated away, like chrome plating the fins of an air cooled motorcycle. it makes it run hotter not cooler.

    i also like the 3.5" I/O module
  • Operandi - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    true, using Ti dosn't make much sense, unless it really looks that much differant then steel or Al.

    Other then that it looks like a pretty sweet case.
  • Odeen - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    Guys... Titanium is NOT a good material to be anywhere on a computer enclosure. While it IS far more rust-proof (A coat of oxide forms on titanium as soon as it is exposed to air, and stays there to prevent further corrosion) than steel, titanium fails as a computer enclosure.

    Titanium is softer than steel - it scratches far more easily. It also can't be polished. What's worse, titanium does not transfer heat as "readily" as steel. While this is a great trait for a watch (a titanium watch doesn't feel as cold against your wrist as a steel watch when you first put it on), you WANT the case to radiate as much heat as possible. Hence, aluminum cases do a little better than steel, and acrylic cases suck for thermal management.

    Still, neato case. I like the 3.5" front I/O module, I could use one for another black case I might have :)
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    Dont worry, the next one is worth the wait...
  • nastyemu25 - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    what's up with the ass-ugly case trend
  • araczynski - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    when i saw the innards, my mind visualized "packard bell" <shudder>

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now